Why is there a need to maintain two versions of JDBC adaptors, both the ordinary and optimised ones?
Though the performance of the optimised JDBC adaptor is much better than the JDBC adaptor, it is not always better to use the optimised JDBC adaptor. There is a price to be paid in terms of higher memory usage when using the optimised version. The optimised JDBC achieves better performance through the use of prepared statements which consumes certain amount of memory. User is given the option to pick the adaptor to be used according to his application needs.
Related Questions
- Will all manufacturers maintain both Leaded (Pb) and RoHS/Pb-Free versions as stocked items or will Pb versions become special ordered parts?
- Do we still maintain two versions of JDBC adapters: the ordinary version and the optimized version respectively?
- Why is there a need to maintain two versions of JDBC adaptors, both the ordinary and optimised ones?
