Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why use GutenMark rather than another text-to-html markup utility?

GutenMark html Markup text utility
0
10 Posted

Why use GutenMark rather than another text-to-html markup utility?

0

Although GutenMark is a text-to-html markup tool, it is not a general-purpose utility. It is designed to correct the deficiencies of books that are in plain-vanilla ASCII format, and (specifically) Project Gutenberg etexts. The goal is 100% automatic publishable-quality markup. In other words, to produce books that look as if they had been published. General-purpose tools are not really suited for this, but it doesn’t hurt to try them. Let me know if any of them do a really good job, and I’ll take a look at them. Here are some samples from the most promising general-purpose text-to-HTML and text-to-PDF tools I’ve found. To get an apples-to-apples comparison, all samples have been converted to PDF, using the Times font. (In viewing them, ignore things like goofed-up page headings, because these are my fault from not wanting to spend a lot of time figuring the tools out.) Remember: No manual markup or editing has taken place. • GutenMark sample: 48K. • txt2html sample: 47K. • txt2htm sam

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.