With FTTH, existing copper infrastructure will have to be replaced by fibre optic. Is n t too expensive?
With the introduction of the Internet over the HFC infrastructure, old coax cables have been gradually replaced by new coax cables. The drawback of deploying FTTB/FTTH networks was primary associated with the high cost for construction and the lack of pragmatic and realistic solutions. Today with the introduction of advanced installation systems and the availability of cost effective network equipment that ensures a graduated migration toward digital services without jeopardising existing revenues make the fiber based access solution economically more feasible. Why not just build FTTB/FTTH future-proof networks today?
Related Questions
- If a FTTP (fibre to the premises) solution does not offer any moreservices than we can get through a copper net–why then choose a more expensive FTTP solution?
- With FTTH, existing copper infrastructure will have to be replaced by fibre optic. Is n t too expensive?
- What are the advantages of fibre optic against copper wire?
